Inmate Jail Search

Inmate Jail Search – How to locate which jail/prision a minor inmate is in?

How to locate which jail/prision a minor inmate is in?

hi, my ex bf is in jail, and i want to send him a letter, the only thing is that i have no idea what jail he is in, and i dont have a number to cantact his parents or family members.
he is a minor (16years old) , and was sent to jail for being a by standard in a murder(shooting/agravated robers) < -- or so i was told im not 100% on it.
the crime was done in either texas( the irving/ dallar are im gussing because thats where he lived) or somewhere in oklahoma.

hes a 16year old , black male, name is antonio holmes.

if you have any information on him, like news articles, or could help me find which jail/prison he is in Anwser this question, and either send me an email, or give me and email adress that i could contact you at if i have any further questions.

this help would be greatly apprecated !
and 10 points to the best.

PS i have tryed a few of thoes inmate searches and have come up empty handed( im guessing because he is under 18)
i have no was of contacting his parents

I KNOW THIS QUESTION DOESNT BELONG IN THIS SECTION BUT IT IS THE ONLY PLACE IT GETS NOTICED, PLEASE DONT REPORT, OR HAVE DELETED. SORRY AND THANK YOU.

10POINTS =)

---

In the Michigan Department of Corrections website you will be able to search about Michigan inmates through the Offender Tracking Information System or OTIS. The OTIS will be able to generate information about inmates who are or were incarcerated, on parole, or probation under the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections. It also holds information on offenders who have transferred in and out of Michigan under the Michigan State compact and those offenders who have escaped their sentence.

There are certain limitations to the OTIS. These are:

· It does not contain information that is regarded as confidential by the Michigan Freedom of Information Act.

· It does not contain any information on a person who has been arrested and convicted but not yet sentenced.

· It does not contain information on inmates who are in county jails or city lockups.

· It does not contain information on offenders sentenced to jail. In Michigan, jails are under the counties supervision while prisons are run by the MDOC.

· It does not contain pictures of inmates who were released prior to the taking of electronic photographs.

· It only contains information on inmates who have been under the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections for the last three years. The Michigan Legislature only requires the MDOC to keep information about inmates on OTIS up until three years after his or her discharge.

Information on inmates is removed from the OTIS database if:

· The conviction has been set aside.

· Information has been expunged by sentencing court.

· Information has been expunged by operation of law.

· Three years have gone by after the inmate’s release from the custody of the MDOC.

If you want more information on a particular inmate, there are other websites that can give this to you. By paying a certain amount, you will not be limited to a Michigan inmate search but will be able to search for inmates all over the country.

The Author Is A Member Of One Of The Largest Public Records Database On The Internet. Visit http://www.Gov-Registry.org To Run A FREE Preliminary Search!

Michigan Inmate Search

---

Pleas bargaining is said to be the most critical process in the criminal justice system. Plea-bargaining is when the defendant agrees to settle a case with certain guidelines and conditions. The prosecution will ask the defendant for a guilty plea in exchange for a reduced or even suspended sentence. The prosecution may agree to reduce the amount of charges as well. Although estimates vary it is said that 95% of criminal cases incorporate come from of plea-bargaining. Plea-bargaining is just one part of the very lengthy criminal justice process. The criminal process begins with a crime-taking place and then continues on with the formal investigation. After the investigation is concluded and there is cause to issue a warrant, the suspect will be placed under arrest and brought to the police station for processing (booking). Depending on the crime and the defendant they will be either released from custody or held until the next phase of the process.

The next phase is the arraignment in which the defendant enteres their plea of guilty or not guilty to the charge. During the arraignment the defendant also is advised of the nature of the charge(s). The defendant is also advised that they have the right to have an attorney to represent them in the matter.

Following the arraignment the trial is the next phase. Depending on the crime committed the trial will either occur in front of a judge who will make the ruling on the case, or in front of a jury whom will decide the fate of the case. During a typical trial their will be opening statements by both the prosecution and the defence. The next step will be where the prosecutor presents their case. This will be done by calling witnesses and presenting evidence to the court. The defence presents their case next and after this is concluded the trial is concluded.

Plea-bargaining offers many benefits to both the defendant and the criminal justice system as a whole. Throughout the criminal justice system many people are effected by the use of plea bargains in a positive way. In terms of the defendant there are many benefits, which entice them to enter into a plea bargain. For one they defendant who may be facing multiple charges and the potential for years in jail has the potential to get multiple charges dropped as well as getting a significantly reduced sentence. With attorney fees ranging from several hundred to several thousand the costs of a trial can be staggering. Disposing of a case prior to trial will have a large impact, as the costs will be notably less. Plea-bargaining also came save the defendant money as the matter will be resolved more quickly and there will be little impact on the defendant’s job and wages will not be lost.

The advantage for the defence is that less work is required on their part and they typically receive the same amount of money in return. An advantage for the prosecutor is they get a conviction and can alter the sentence any way they see fit. The court system heavily relied on the use of pleas to keep the system moving. In cases involving a plea the judge is able to dispose of a case quickly and move on to the next. In terms of jails and prisons plea-bargaining can also reduce the amount of inmate entering the facilities as jail time may have been suspended as a condition of a plea bargain.

The United States have been implementing pleas bargaining in the country for several hundreds years. Over time issues have resolved in term of defendants rights and specifically that the defendant has the right to have a trial by a jury. Sceptics of plea bargaining also argue that the criminal justice system had became too soft on criminals by allowing for lighter sentencing in exchange for a guilty plea.

Several other disadvantages are associated with plea-bargaining as well. One such disadvantage it that even though a judge and prosecutor may have an agreement and a plea bargain worked out, the courts still have to have the final determination and agree with the terms of the plea bargain. If for whatever reason the court rejects the plea then the case will proceed to a full trial. A big disadvantage for the defendant is that once they sign a plea agreement and agree to plead guilty they will have no opportunity for an appeal at a later date.

There is little doubt that plea-bargaining has a dramatic effect on the criminal system as a whole. The use of plea bargains helps everyone throughout the process from the defendant all the way through the criminal justice system to the jails. Without the use of plea bargains the criminal justice systems would be at a great disadvantage and the system would be crimpled.

Heumann, Milton. 1977. PLEA BARGAINING: THE EXPERIENCES OF PROSECUTORS, JUDGES, AND DEFENSE ATTORNEYS. Boston: G.K. Hall.

McConnell, Michael and Chester L. Mirsky. 1995. “The Rise of Guilty Pleas: New York, 1800-1865,” 22 JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIETY 443.

Vogel, Mary Elizabeth. 1999. “The Social Origins of Plea Bargaining: Conflict and the Law in the Process of State Formation, 1830-1860,” 33 LAW AND SOCIETY REVIEW 161.

About The Author

Kenneth R Tapscott is a Criminal Justice major currently working in the law enforcement field. More information can be obtained at http://www.tapscott.info.

Incoming search terms:

• free minor inmate search
• inmate minor search

Tags: Inmate Jail Search

No comments yet.

Leave a comment